Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Appleton vs Justina Mikulskyte Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Mikulskyte analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Justina Mikulskyte Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Appleton 1 - 0 Mikulskyte
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 47.69% of points on his second serve, while Mikulskyte has won 43.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 52.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mikulskyte has won 58.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.44% and 41.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 52.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mikulskyte has saved 45.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 53.97% of matches played (W/L 34/ 29), with Mikulskyte winning 57.83% (W/L 48/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Mikulskyte has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 93/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26), where as Mikulskyte has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.83% of matches (W/L 48/ 35). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Appleton winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Appleton winning 2 and Mikulskyte winning 1. The last match between Appleton and Mikulskyte was at the W75 Croissy-Beaubourg, 26-03-2024, First, I.hard with Emily Appleton getting the victory 2-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Appleton and Mikulskyte have played a deciding set 1 times, with Appleton winning 1 times and Mikulskyte 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Appleton winning 1, and Mikulskyte 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.67 while Mikulskyte has played against players with an average rank of 311.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mikulskyte has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mikulskyte has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Appleton 1 - 0 Mikulskyte
394
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
224
Rank
219
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
50% (181-178)
Career Total W/L
59% (213-150)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$2,804
Career Prize Money
$2,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Appleton VS Mikulskyte H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Emily Appleton | Justina Mikulskyte |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 43% (42/97) | 56% (48/86) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (35/42) | 69% (33/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (24/55) | 53% (20/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (33/86) | 39% (38/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Appleton VS Mikulskyte H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 |
Stats 
Emily Appleton
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
43%
(
42 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
10
14
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Appleton | Justina Mikulskyte |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (37/31) | 46% (24/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (321/308) | 48% (224/242) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 33% (3/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.64 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 197 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.61 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 189 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:44 | 1:35:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 284.77 | 373.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1140/1992) | 64% (855/1339) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (806/1140) | 54% (463/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (401/852) | 43% (206/484) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (92/237) | 50% (83/165) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (887/2132) | 46% (603/1321) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (18/13) | 50% (11/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (18/31) | 48% (10/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 25% (12/3) |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Kyle S. Mcphillips
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ivana Corley
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Justina Mikulskyte Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eugenie Bouchard
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Anastasiya Soboleva
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
83%
(
57 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Gergana Topalova
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Julia Middendorf
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
43%
(
42 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
10
14
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Appleton Vs Mikulskyte Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
